MOQ 2 pcs · Standard models · Typical lead time ~15 days
📧 info@yoyangpower.com 📱 WhatsApp +86 173 1279 3518 ⚡ Typical reply within 24h
Home / Guides / Link Sites

Solar Power for Wireless Bridge Links: What One Pole Carries

Solar power for wireless bridge sites is decided by a load list, not by the radio’s headline range. A point-to-point link is a small load that never switches off: the radio transmits through the night, the uplink router answers every hour, and a camera watching the far end adds its own draw on top. All of it comes out of one 60 W budget and one daily energy account.

This guide builds the load list for a bridge pole, runs the two tests against it, and shows where the second end of the link changes the answer.

60 W / 5 A shared output Two ends, two load lists 326 / 490 / 979 Wh usable MOQ 2 pcs

Q: Can solar power run a wireless bridge link?

A: Worked example, not a promise: a point-to-point bridge radio drawing 9 W, a 4G router at 5 W and one camera at 6 W sum to 20 W continuous, well inside the 60 W output ceiling, and 480 Wh a day. Against the usable reserves of the four standard systems that is about 0.7 days on 326 Wh, 1.0 day on 490 Wh and 2.0 days on 979 Wh of zero charging, so the link’s size comes from the daily account and the site’s worst month rather than from the radio’s range. The load list below is how to run it on your own hardware.

Why a Link Pole Is Not a Camera Pole

Solar power for wireless bridge work starts from the device list rather than from the radio’s range, because the two figures that decide the system are watts and hours.

A camera site draws in bursts and idles in between. A link site does neither. The radio holds its transmit power for as long as the link is up, the router answers the carrier around the clock, and the daily figure therefore sits close to the continuous figure multiplied by 24. A load of 20 W that would be a rounding error on a mains-fed pole becomes 480 Wh a day on a battery, every day, including the days the sun does not show.

The second difference is that a link has two ends. Power is usually wanted where the cable cannot go, which is both ends at once, and the far end is often the harder one: a hilltop, a mast on a rented roof, a gate post with no building behind it. One unit per end is the normal layout, so the load list is built twice and the smaller of the two ends does not subsidise the larger.

Neither difference changes the method. Both ends are sized with the same output ceiling and the same daily account, which is the arithmetic in the four-step sizing order.

Step one

The Load List for a Bridge Pole

Reference figures for the three devices that usually share a link pole. They are planning values, so replace each one with the rating on the device you intend to mount.

Device on the poleTypical continuous drawWhat it does to the account
Point-to-point bridge radio6 to 12 WHolds transmit power day and night, whether or not traffic is moving
4G router or CPE uplink3 to 8 WPresent every hour; the figure that decides the night, not the peak
Camera at either end5 to 10 WInfrared roughly doubles the night figure, so count it at its dark-hours value
Anything else on the feedAdd itSplits the same 60 W and the same watt-hours; nothing is free on a shared output

Working reference figures for planning, not device specifications. Read the label or the datasheet of the bridge, router and camera you plan to mount, and use those numbers in the two tests below.

Test One: The 60 W Ceiling

All four standard systems publish the same output: DC 12 V nominal with a maximum of 16 V, a rated 60 W continuous, and a maximum current of 5 A on a DC5521 socket. Treat 60 W as the load budget and apply it to the total on the output rather than to each device.

A bridge radio at 9 W, a router at 5 W and a camera at 6 W come to 20 W, which leaves 40 W of the budget unspent. That margin is not spare capacity for a second link: the ceiling is a continuous rating, and a radio that draws a burst at start or a camera that switches on infrared adds to the same total. A link pole normally passes this test with room, and the reason it still needs care is the second test.

What the output delivers at the far end of a run is a separate question from what it delivers at the box. The published envelope is set out in the 12 V output at the camera.

Test Two: The Daily Account

Usable energy is quoted on a fixed basis, at 12 V nominal, with the reserve the system keeps in hand and the conversion loss already taken off: about 326 Wh on a 40 Ah battery, 490 Wh on 60 Ah and 979 Wh on 120 Ah. Divide each by the site’s daily figure and the result is the boundary in days of zero charging.

The three-device list lands like this. At 20 W continuous, 480 Wh a day, the boundary is about 0.7 days on the smallest reserve, 1.0 day on the middle one and 2.0 days on the largest. Drop the camera and the link alone draws 14 W, or 336 Wh a day, which moves the boundary to about 1.0, 1.5 and 2.9 days. Drop the router as well and the bridge radio on its own takes 216 Wh a day, giving about 1.5, 2.3 and 4.5 days. Those are worked examples on reference draws; the real list replaces every figure in them.

This is why a link site is usually planned from the battery upwards. The radio is a small number that never stops, so the reserve, not the panel, is what keeps the link up through a long dark stretch.

The Worst Month Sets the Panel

The panel has to put the daily figure back on the shortest day of the worst month, not on an average day. At 4 peak-sun hours and 75 percent overall efficiency, an 80 W panel returns about 240 Wh a day (80 × 4 × 0.75 = 240), a 120 W panel about 360 Wh and a 240 W panel about 720 Wh.

Set those against the three-device list at 480 Wh a day and the arithmetic is blunt. The 80 W and 120 W panels return less than the site spends in the worst month, so the reserve drains a little every day until the season turns. The 240 W panel returns 720 Wh against 480 Wh spent, which leaves 240 Wh a day of headroom for the days that come in under 4 peak-sun hours. The link alone at 216 Wh a day sits inside the 120 W panel’s return with room, which is the difference between powering a link and powering a link plus a camera.

Peak-sun hours are site data, so use the worst month at the actual location rather than a national average. What a run of grey days does to the reserve, and what the site looks like when it empties, is worked in the grey-week arithmetic.

One Unit per End, or One Unit and a Long Run

A 12 V feed loses voltage with distance, so the farther a device sits from the output, the less of the published envelope reaches it. On a bridge link the distance is not a few metres: the two ends are separated by the very gap the link exists to cross, which is measured in hundreds of metres or in kilometres. A single system feeding both ends would need a cable across that gap, which is the trench the link was bought to avoid.

The layout that follows is one self-contained unit at each end. Each unit carries its own panel, its own reserve and the devices at that end, and each end gets its own load list: the near end might be a radio and a camera, the far end a radio, a router and a camera, in which case the far end is the larger system even though the sites look symmetrical on a map.

Where a single unit does serve two devices, keep the run short and check the drop before mounting. Device-side cable and terminations are the installer’s to size, and the connector on the output is a DC5521 socket.

Mounting: Two Things That Share a Pole

A panel and a directional antenna on the same pole compete for the same sky. The antenna needs a clear line to its partner, and the panel needs an unobstructed arc toward the equator, so the usual arrangement puts the array on its own cross-arm below the antenna, where neither shadows the other and the panel’s tilt does not point through the dish.

Two physical details decide more than they look. The first is that the panel’s own shadow falls on the pole and the cabinet, not on the array, so the mounting height has to clear the hardware below it. The second is snow and dust on the glass: a link site is often unmanned, and a panel that is not visited is a panel that is not cleaned. The cleaning interval and the seasonal sweep are covered in the maintenance calendar, and the mounting assumptions in power for a remote wifi hotspot apply to any mast that carries a radio. A mast that carries instruments instead adds a logger and an uplink to the same pole, and the loads on a station mast are listed with their daily figures.

Aim the antenna first and the panel second. Moving a panel a few degrees costs a little yield; moving an antenna a few degrees can cost the link.

When the Link Shares the Mast

Most link poles are not link-only. The same mast usually carries the uplink that feeds the bridge, and often a camera watching the gate or the compound. That is a hotspot site with a radio link attached, and the load arithmetic is the same one worked in how much power does a wifi hotspot use: small devices, present every hour, summed and multiplied by 24.

The uplink is the part buyers forget to count. A router that draws 5 W is 120 Wh a day on its own, which is more than a third of the smallest reserve, before the bridge radio is switched on. The router’s figure is broken down device by device in the router’s share, and a site that needs both a hotspot and a link is planned as one load list rather than two projects.

If the mast also carries cameras, the count question is a separate test on the same budget. Several cameras on one system runs it, and the ceiling applies to every device on the feed, link included.

Night, and What the Reserve Is For

The panel contributes nothing after dark and the reserve carries the whole feed. For a link that means the radio, the router and the camera draw for the longest half of a winter day with no input at all, and the boundary figure calculated above is exactly the number of those days the site can string together.

The practical read is to size the battery on the night figure and the panel on the 24-hour figure, then check both against the worst month. A site that passes the daily account in June and fails it in December has the wrong panel, not the wrong battery. What happens when the reserve does reach zero, and what brings the site back, is described in when the account runs to zero.

Four standard sizes

Which Size Holds a Link Pole

The column that matters for a link is the daily load each reserve carries with about a day of boundary. The full range with options is on the solar power supply for cctv camera page.

ModelSolar panelBatteryUsable energyOutputDaily load it holds for 1+ day of boundary
YO-M804080 W40 Ahabout 326 WhDC 12 V / 5 Aup to roughly 280 Wh a day
YO-P12060120 W (3 × 40 W)60 Ahabout 490 WhDC 12 V / 5 Aup to roughly 420 Wh a day
YO-P12060-T120 W (3 × 40 W)60 Ahabout 490 WhDC 12 V / 5 Athe same account, on the heavy-duty triangle bracket
YO-P240120240 W120 Ahabout 979 WhDC 12 V / 5 Aup to roughly 840 Wh a day

Panel and battery figures are the published ratings of the four models; usable energy follows the reserve basis described above, and the daily-load column is a planning band at a 1.1-day boundary, not a promise about any site. The final model should be selected based on the total daily energy consumption, local sunlight conditions, and the required backup time.

Send the link’s load list

The bridge radio, the uplink router, a camera at each end, and the worst month at the site. You get the ceiling total, the daily account and the size that holds both ends.

Send the Numbers

Quick Answers

Can one system power both ends of a bridge?
Not across the gap. A 12 V feed loses voltage with distance, and the distance between two link ends is the gap the link exists to cross, so feeding both from one unit means a cable run across it. One self-contained unit at each end keeps every run short and gives each end its own load list.
How long will a link run without sun?
Worked example: a 9 W bridge radio with a 5 W router and a 6 W camera draws 480 Wh a day, which the three standard reserves cover for about 0.7, 1.0 and 2.0 days of zero charging. Drop the camera and the same link at 336 Wh a day sits at about 1.0, 1.5 and 2.9 days. The real figure depends on your devices and the reserve you choose.
Is a bridge a small load?
Small in watts, large in hours. A 9 W radio is 216 Wh a day because it draws all 24 hours, which is more than a 20 W camera that runs for eight of them. Continuous devices are counted on the full day, not on the hours anyone is watching.
Does a longer link need a bigger panel?
No. Range is a radio question; the panel is sized by the daily account and the worst month. A longer link can change the antenna and the mounting height, but the panel only changes when the watts or the hours change.
Can the panel and the antenna share one pole?
Yes, on separate mounting points. Put the array on its own cross-arm below the antenna so the panel does not sit in the antenna’s path and the antenna’s shadow does not fall across the glass. Aim the antenna first, then set the panel’s tilt.

Output, recharge and model questions are collected on the answers page, and terms, minimum order and lead time for moq solar power system camera orders are listed on the shipping page.

Size the link, both ends

Send the radio, the router and a camera at each end, plus the worst month. You get the ceiling total, the daily account and a size with margin over both, typically within 24 hours.

Send the Numbers

See the range

Panel, battery, usable energy and bracket type side by side, quoted FOB China.

Compare All 4 Models

Minimum order 2 pcs · FOB China · Payment is 100% in advance, by T/T bank transfer · Standard models · Typical lead time ~15 days

WhatsApp Email Us